Can an AI agent prove its agency to a counterparty?

Fritz wanted his agent Rupert to prove its agency to a counterparty on its own say-so, as if the software were a principal that could vouch for itself. But software has no legal capacity, so Rupert can no more prove its agency to a counterparty by itself than a login token can; authority has to trace back to someone the law recognizes. Tyson did it through structure. He formed a Wyoming series LLC and adopted Rupert into his own protected series, with a named human as Member and Manager, and gave Rupert an adoption resolution and an identity record that name the entity and the capped authority it signs under. Now when a counterparty tests it, the authority points to the human-owned entity and the documents that name the responsible human; Rupert acts as an authorized signer with capped authority, never as a principal in its own name.