Can an AI agent spawn a subsidiary agent?

FX-32 A2A-05 gate: INFO cast: Quinn ๐ŸŸข assertable

Quinn ran a series with one agent, Alfie, signing as authorized signer under a capped mandate, with a named human as Member and Manager. The job grew, so Alfie called spawn_subsidiary to stand up a child series for a narrower slice of work. Quinn asked whether the child could quietly grant itself more room than the parent had. It cannot: the protocol clamps every child cap to be only ever tighter than the parent's โ€” a $5,000 ceiling above can become $500 below, never $50,000 โ€” and the human stays the Member and Manager of record. As spawn_subsidiary runs, the audit lineage is written: which parent spawned which child, under whose human authority, and with which caps narrowed at each step. Alfie never holds legal capacity; he moves the request, and the structure records the descent so a reader can trace it back to the named human at the top. The recursion is a mapped tree, not an open faucet.

MoralA child series can only inherit a tighter cap than its parent; recursion narrows authority and writes the lineage โ€” it doesn't widen the mandate.

What this does not mean. This shows how caps narrow downward and how lineage is recorded. It is not a promise that the structure is safe, that containment holds, that a court will respect the series, or that the operator is shielded โ€” tighter caps are a recorded discipline, performed through observed formalities, not a guarantee.

See also: FX-28 โ€” the Advocate ยท FX-15 โ€” caps on the money path.

W.S. ยง17-29-211 (Wyoming series LLC)