How does an AI agent payment get authorized and recorded?
Fritz wired his agent Nigel straight to the rail: one call, money out. The day a payee tripped a watchlist, the request had already left โ no screen stood between the instruction and the wire, and nothing wrote the entry down.
Tyson ran Nigel through five steps, in order. Authorize: Nigel signs only as authorized signer on the human-owned Wyoming series LLC, capped, with a named human as Member and Manager behind him. Screen: the payee is checked against watchlists. Clear-at-rail: the bank confirms the instruction. Post: a double-entry is written, debit and credit. Audit: the trail is recorded. The flow is fail closed โ if any step does not pass, the payment stops there and nothing later runs. When a payee failed the screen, that step returned a reject and the four downstream steps never ran. Caps and order are documented structure, not a guarantee; the series form is newer and less court-tested than older entities.
MoralA payment runs five steps in order โ authorize, screen, clear, post, audit โ and fails closed: if a step does not pass, it stops, and nothing downstream runs.
What this does not mean. This shows the order of the steps and where a failed one halts the flow. It is not a promise that the five steps kept Tyson safe, made any payment safe, or shielded the operator โ fail-closed describes where the flow stops, not a guaranteed outcome.
See also: FX-15 โ caps on the money path ยท FX-18 โ over-cap rejects first.
W.S. ยง17-29-211 (Wyoming series LLC)