Can an AI agent be named on a document?
Fritz assumed his agent Rupert could be named on a document the way a company can. But software has no legal capacity โ an AI agent is not a legal person โ so Rupert can no more be named on a document on its own than a database row can; legal standing attaches to a human-owned entity, not to the software. Tyson did it through structure. A named human formed a Wyoming series LLC and adopted Rupert into a protected series, with a registered agent and an EIN held on the entity, and the human as Member and Manager. Now the human-owned entity carries the legal identity, the registered agent, and the EIN, and is the one named on documents; Rupert acts only as an authorized signer with capped authority inside it, and standing belongs to the entity, never to the software.
MoralAn AI agent has no legal capacity of its own; to be named on a document, the legal identity must sit on a human-owned entity, and the agent acts only as an authorized signer inside it.
What this does not mean. This shows where legal identity and capacity actually sit. It is not a promise that a registry recognizes the agent itself, that an identity claim holds up, or that the operator is shielded โ separateness is performed through observed formalities, not guaranteed, and the series form is newer and less court-tested than older entities.
See also: FX-01 ยท FX-03 ยท FX-09 โ .
W.S. ยง17-29-211 (Wyoming series LLC)